# Claude Design vs Figma Make: Which Prompt-to-Prototype Tool?

> Claude Design vs Figma Make compared on what each makes, plan and seat requirements, design-system input, refinement, export, and handoff to code.

Verdict first: Figma Make if your team's source of truth is a Figma file and someone maintains a React design system as an npm package. Claude Design if you are already on a paid Claude plan and the output is a prototype, deck, or one-pager that has to look like your product and then get built by Claude Code.

Use [Figma Make](/tools/figma-make) if your team's source of truth is a Figma file and someone maintains a React design system you can publish as an npm package. Use [Claude Design](/tools/claude-design) if you already pay for Claude and the output is a prototype, deck, or one-pager that has to look like your product and then get built by [Claude Code](/tools/claude-code). They overlap on prompt-to-prototype and diverge on almost everything else: what they make, who is allowed to use them, how the design system gets in, and where the work goes next. The wider stack is in [the best AI tools for designers in 2026](/guides/comparisons/best-ai-tools-for-designers-2026), and the [Claude Design guide](/guides/design/claude-design-guide) is the pillar behind this comparison.

## The short answer

- **A clickable prototype using your real components**: Figma Make, with a Make kit.
- **A deck, a one-pager, or a landing page on brand**: Claude Design.
- **A prototype that has to sit next to the design file**: Figma Make.
- **You are on a paid Claude plan and not a paid Figma plan**: Claude Design, and vice versa.
- **The next step is production code in your repo**: Claude Design's handoff bundle, or Figma Make's GitHub push, depending on which repo you mean.

## Dimension by dimension

| | Claude Design | Figma Make |
| --- | --- | --- |
| What it makes | Prototypes, wireframes, mockups, decks, one-pagers, landing pages, documents | Functional prototypes, web apps, interactive UI |
| Where it runs | claude.ai/design and Claude Desktop | Inside Figma |
| Who can use it | Pro, Max, Team, Enterprise, included with the plan | Full seats on paid Figma plans; restricted trial on Starter |
| Design system in | GitHub repo, design files, raw uploads, local codebase | Make kit: React design system from npm, plus written guidelines |
| Refinement | Chat, inline comments, direct canvas editing, generated sliders | Chat, plan mode, editing the generated code |
| Publish | Org-scoped link, PPTX, PDF, standalone HTML, Send to Canva | Public URL with custom domains, Figma Community, embeds |
| Handoff to code | Bundle for Claude Code | One-way push to a GitHub repository |
| Back into design | Not a Figma file | Copy the preview into Figma Design as layers |

## What each one makes

Figma's help center defines Make as a prompt-to-app tool for turning ideas and existing Figma designs into functional prototypes, web apps, and interactive UI. Figma says Make works with any web framework, with React, Vue, and Svelte verified. The output is an app you can open, click through, and read the code of.

Claude Design covers that ground and keeps going into the artifacts around it: wireframes and mockups for a feature flow, pitch decks, marketing collateral, landing pages, dashboards, forms, and one-pagers, exported as PPTX, PDF, or standalone HTML. It launched from Anthropic Labs as a research preview on April 17, 2026 and is in beta as of September 2026. If half of what you produce is presentation material rather than interface, that difference decides it. Both belong to the [generative UI](/glossary/generative-ui) category, where the model builds the interface rather than a component you then arrange.

## Who is allowed to use it

This is where teams get surprised. Figma lists Make on Professional, Organization, and Enterprise plans, Full seats only. Dev, Collab, and View seats can create and try Make in drafts, but cannot share or publish. The free Starter plan gets a trial that cannot use team libraries for style context and can only publish to the web by also publishing to the Figma Community. So a developer or a PM on a Dev or Collab seat cannot run the prototype loop for you.

Claude Design is in beta on Pro, Max, Team, and Enterprise and is included with the subscription rather than sold as a seat, though Enterprise organizations need an admin to enable it. It draws on the same usage pool as chat, Claude Code, and Cowork, so heavy Design sessions eat into your other Claude work. Which plan makes sense is covered in [which Claude plan for designers](/guides/design/which-claude-plan-for-designers).

## Getting the design system in

Figma Make's answer is Make kits. You publish your production React design system as a package to the public npm registry or to your organization's private registry, then add guidelines: Markdown files covering components, styles, tokens, and general rules, which Make can draft by analyzing your packages and library styles. Figma is explicit that Make kits currently support only codebases written in React, and that any Make user on a paid plan can publish private packages while anyone on any plan can use public ones. When it works, the prototype is built from the same code as production.

Claude Design imports from GitHub repositories, design files, raw uploads, or a local codebase, builds a design system during onboarding, and then uses those colors, typography, and components automatically on later projects, validating output against the system before showing it to you. Team and Enterprise admins can approve and lock a standard system. It is the looser route, and the one that works when your components are not a published npm package, or not React at all. The [design tokens](/glossary/design-tokens) entry covers what to standardize first either way.

## How you refine, and where the work goes

Claude Design's editing model is visual: talk to it for structural changes, leave an inline comment on one component, drag and resize directly on the canvas, or ask for a slider on the parameter you want to explore, then screenshot the states. Figma Make's is developer-shaped: iterate in conversation, use plan mode, and edit the generated code when the conversation stops being precise enough.

Handoff diverges the same way. Figma Make publishes to a public URL with custom domains, embeds a prototype in a slide deck or design file, copies its preview back into Figma Design as editable layers, and pushes code to a GitHub repository it creates for the file. That push is one way: edits made in GitHub do not come back and get overwritten on the next push. Claude Design packages a handoff bundle you pass to Claude Code with a single instruction, which is the better fit when the destination is an existing codebase with its own conventions. For the third route, where the design stays in Figma and an agent reads it, see [Figma MCP](/tools/figma-mcp) and [Figma to code with Claude](/guides/design/figma-to-code-with-claude).

## Which to choose

Choose Figma Make when the team already pays for Figma Full seats, the design system is React and publishable, and the prototype needs to live beside the file everyone reviews. Choose Claude Design when you are already paying for Claude, when decks and one-pagers are half the job, or when the handoff target is a codebase Claude Code already knows. If you can run both, use Claude Design for exploration and the presentation layer, and Figma Make for the prototype that has to be built out of the real components.

## Sources and further reading

- [Figma Make FAQs](https://help.figma.com/hc/en-us/articles/31722591905559-Figma-Make-FAQs) — Figma
- [Use your design system package in Make kits](https://help.figma.com/hc/en-us/articles/35946832653975-Use-your-design-system-package-in-Make-kits) — Figma
- [Push from Figma Make to GitHub](https://help.figma.com/hc/en-us/articles/35463818346647-Push-from-Figma-Make-to-GitHub) — Figma
- [Figma pricing](https://www.figma.com/pricing/) — Figma
- [Claude Design](https://claude.com/product/design) — Anthropic
- [Claude Design from Anthropic Labs](https://www.anthropic.com/news/claude-design-anthropic-labs) — Anthropic

---

_Source: https://agentscamp.com/guides/comparisons/claude-design-vs-figma-make — Guide on AgentsCamp._