Skip to content
agentscamp
Skill · Release

Release Readiness Reviewer

Review whether a specific release is ready to ship by checking scope, tests, compatibility, migrations, configuration, observability, rollout, rollback, support, security, and ownership against explicit evidence. Use before a production deployment, major version, risky feature launch, migration, or go/no-go meeting.

User-invocablev1.0.0
Updated Aug 4, 2026
npx agentscamp add skills/release-readiness-reviewer

Install to ~/.claude/skills/release-readiness-reviewer/SKILL.md

Produces an evidence-backed go, conditional-go, or no-go recommendation for one release. It checks changed behavior, required tests, compatibility, migrations, flags, configuration, security, observability, progressive delivery, rollback feasibility, communications, and accountable owners without treating a green CI badge as complete readiness.

Judge one release from current evidence and name what remains unresolved.

Workflow

  1. Establish release identity. Record artifact or commit, environment, intended time, included changes, excluded work, owners, risk class, and user impact. Reject a moving or ambiguous scope.
  2. Review change evidence. Inspect diffs, tests, dependency and configuration changes, generated artifacts, feature flags, operational tasks, and known issues. Link every readiness claim to a source.
  3. Check compatibility. Verify API, schema, event, SDK, client, runtime, and infrastructure compatibility across mixed versions and deploy order. Identify mandatory coordination.
  4. Assess data and configuration. Review migrations, backfills, secrets, environment variables, defaults, capacity, region differences, and one-way transformations. Confirm target values without exposing credentials.
  5. Evaluate verification. Require relevant automated and manual results, unresolved failures, representative environments, performance or load evidence where risk warrants, and post-deploy smoke tests.
  6. Confirm observability and support. Name dashboards, alerts, logs, traces, business signals, on-call owner, escalation, status communication, customer support notes, and known symptom recognition.
  7. Review rollout and recovery. Check stages, cohorts, bake times, promotion gates, abort thresholds, rollback mechanism, data compatibility, recovery time, and fallback when rollback is impossible.
  8. Issue the decision. Choose go, conditional go, or no-go. List blockers separately from accepted risks, conditions, owners, deadlines, approval authority, and evidence that will close each item.

WARNING

Do not turn unknowns into implicit acceptance. An unverified migration, missing owner, or untested rollback remains visible in the decision.

Output

Return release identity, risk summary, evidence matrix, blockers, accepted risks, rollout and rollback readiness, observability and support readiness, decision, approvers, and time-bounded conditions. Include the exact post-deploy verification and abort signals.

Frequently asked questions

What is the difference between release readiness and a release checklist?
A checklist names required areas; a readiness review resolves each item against evidence for the specific release, exposes unknowns and blockers, and assigns a go/no-go recommendation with owners.
Can a release be ready if rollback is impossible?
Sometimes, but only with explicit recognition of the irreversible change, stronger rehearsal and rollout controls, a forward-recovery plan, narrower exposure, and accountable approval.

Related